Nº 16Spring 2022
Please send us your e-mail address and we will keep you updated when new issues are published
Pursuant to current regulation on personal data protection, we inform you that the personal data you provide us by means of this form will be processed by Consorcio de Compensación de Seguros, E.P.E., in order to subscribe you to our digital magazine. You can exercise your rights in terms of data protection by sending an email to our Data Protection Officer at [email protected]. You can get additional information about the processing of your personal data in our Privacy Policy
 
In depth

Analysis of the seven most significant events which the Consorcio de Compensación de Seguros covered in the 2009-2021 dataset

PDF

Jaime Centeno Alarcos - Senior Expert, Technical and Reinsurance Area
Belén Soriano Clavero - Deputy Director, Technical and Reinsurance Area
Consorcio de Compensación de Seguros
 
 
decorative image
 

Since its inception in 1954, the Consorcio de Compensación de Seguros (hereafter CCS) has helped to provide stability to the insurance industry by offering coverage under a system of indemnities for those losses which relate to risks assured that are not open to protection under an ordinary private policy, since they are caused by extraordinary phenomena occurring in Spain which affect risks located there.

All the perils or causes which are included within the Spanish system for covering extraordinary risks are defined in law taking account, not of their quantitative aspect (total amount of loss inflicted), nor of their geographical impact (extent of the area disturbed), but instead of their qualitative side and bearing in mind the very nature of such risks, which are generally typified by their relatively rare occurrence and their high intensity. This means that although such events are prone to producing huge losses, it is not a necessary condition that they should give rise to high-cost loss or damage for the insured victims to be entitled to compensation.

CCS publishes statistics on extraordinary risks on an annual basis including detailed information on exposure and the loss rate arising, for both events featuring high amounts claimed and those that are less significant. Against this backdrop, this article examines the comparatively major events which the CCS covered in the past 13 years, from 2009 to 2021.

For these purposes, an event is taken to mean any happening which prompts losses from a single cause (whether natural or human) or causes acting in combination (such as flooding and storms), where these are inflicted over a period of several successive days over a very extensive or very tightly concentrated geographical area (according to the circumstances) and involve substantial economic value.

The economic values given relate to indemnities paid out and/or provisioned for (pending settlement or payment) as at 30 April 2022. Thus, neither losses that have taken place yet not been reported, nor costs linked to processing claims, such as payments to adjusters or lawyers and other expenses, are included.


All of the economic values are updated to their worth in euros on 31 December 2021. 

The loss or damage shown is for Property and Business Interruption coverage. Personal injury (number of victims) is exclusively reviewed in the section on coverage by type (property, pecuniary loss and personal injury).

 

Selection and general analysis of events

Over the period under review (2009-2021) there have been seven very considerable events with an assortment of causes that make them particularly significant.

The causes of the seven events selected were natural phenomena; flooding (including sea-battering along coasts), atypical cyclonic storms (ACS), earthquake and volcanic eruption, no major event having been caused by humans.

Accordingly, the big events in the 2009–2021 dataset, in chronological order, were:

 
Amounts in Euros as of 31 December 2021
Month and year of the event Affected area Peril/cause Loss Number of handling Mean cost Insured capital
January 2009 Widespread Windstrom (Klaus) 600,585,658 € 27,1347 2,213 € 1,669,312,181,115 € 0.36
May 2011 Murcia Region Earthquake (Lorca) 552,298,293 € 28,856 19,140 € 66,223,141,561 € 8.34
September 2012 Peninsular SE Flood and windstorm 238,983,502 € 25,854 9,244 € 160,194,784,948 € 1.49
September 2019 Peninsular SE Flood 474,701,759 € 56,067 8,467 € 199,845,872,073 € 2.38
January 2020 Widespread Flood, coastal flood and windstorm 217,368,110 € 54,323 4,001 € 212,964,399,614 € 1.02
December 2021 Widespread Flood 91,707,101 € 7,766 11,809 € 34,431,307,823 € 2.66
Sept. To Dec. 2021 La Palma Volcanic eruption and earthquake 223,189,828 € 6,209 35,946 € 5,181,852,345 € 43.07
Totals 2,398,834,250 € 450,422 5,326 € 2,348,153,539,480 € 1.02

Table 1. Details of events.

 

The causes were flooding, windstorm, or a combination of both, earthquakes and volcanic eruption (the eruption was accompanied by a few earth tremors, which produced comparatively minor losses).

The economic loss from these selected events ranges from 91.7 million euros to over 600 million euros.  

The range for the number of claims handled runs from 6,209 for the La Palma eruption to 271,347 for storm Klaus.

The differences in the average cost per claim handled are mainly due to the cause of the event (which we shall go on to discuss below), where this ranges from 2,213 euros to 35,946 euros, with the extreme levels with respect to the number of claims being the other way round in this case, i.e., the smaller average cost was for storm Klaus, while the larger one was for the La Palma volcanic eruption.

The last columns show the sums assured in the claims policies (not including motor vehicles/autos, which have no sum associated with them) and the percentage (per mille or parts per thousand) of the loss indemnified compared to the sum assured, where once again the differences (between 0.36‰ and 43.07‰) are closely related to the cause of the loss. This percentage must be used solely to compare one event with another, since it is not the loss to sum exposed ratio, but rather the loss to sum assured in the policy, which can include risks from all over Spain.

To frame the aforementioned events in due context it is worth describing the relationship between the claims incurred by the selected events and the overall loss which the CCS covers for each of the years in the dataset under review:

 
Amounts in Euros as of 31 December 2021
Year Total Event Percentage
Loss Handlings number Mean cost Loss Handlings number Mean cost Loss Handling number
2009 862,938,599 € 299,549 2,881 € 600,585,658 € 271,347 2,213 € 70% 91%
2010 546,510,661 € 124,804 4,379 € --- --- --- --- ---
2011 762,315,530 € 54,408 14,011 € 552,298,293 € 28,856 19,140 € 72% 53%
2012 309,079,230 € 42,137 7,335 € 238,983,502 € 25,854 9,244 € 77% 61%
2013 199,607,104 € 62,705 3,183 € --- --- --- --- ---
2014 182,798,414 € 53,589 3,411 € --- --- --- --- ---
2015 203,292,988 € 46,109 4,409 € --- --- --- --- ---
2016 202,781,722 € 38,559 5,259 € --- --- --- --- ---
2017 207,628,021 € 100,067 2,075 € --- --- --- --- ---
2018 259,427,160 € 47,469 5,465 € --- --- --- --- ---
2019 763,171,785 € 137,594 5,547 € 474,701,759 € 56,067 8,467 € 62% 41%
2020 370,334,596 € 92,650 3,997 € 217,368,110 € 54,323 4,001 € 59% 59%
2021 539,771,956 € 81,423 6,629 € 314,896,999 € 13,975 22,533 € 58% 17%
Totals 5,409,657,766 € 1,181,063 4,580 € 2,398,834,250 € 450,422 5,326 € 44% 38%

Table 2. Total loss covered by the CCS and claims incurred by the selected events that are representative for the year when they occurred.

 

The seven events selected together account for 44% of indemnities and 38% of claims handled by the CCS over the 2009–2021 period.

In 2021 two significant events accrued - the La Palma volcano and the December flooding. 

We can also see the weight of events relative to the year when they occurred. For economic value this ranges from 58% in 2021 to 77% in 2012 while the interval for the number of claims handled runs from 17% in 2021 to 91% in 2009.

In graphic terms the seven events would be represented thus:

 
Figure 1. Loss and claims handled per event.

Figure 1. Loss and claims handled per event.

 
Figure 2. Percentage of loss and claims handled per event.

Figure 2. Percentage of loss and claims handled per event.

 

As can be appreciated, the event having the largest amount paid out is Klaus (January 2009), which tops 600 million euros, followed by the Lorca earthquake (May 2011) with over 550 million euros and the flooding (from a cut-off low) in the south-east of the Iberian Peninsula (September 2019) at 475 million euros. These events respectively account for 25%, 23% and 20% of the total for the selected events.

The events with the largest number of claims handled is (as mentioned) the windstorm named Klaus (January 2009), which had a widespread effect over a large part of Spain, surpassing 270,000 claims filed and representing 60% of those for the selected events.

 
Figure 3. Average cost of indemnities per event.

Figure 3. Average cost of indemnities per event.

 

The most substantial average costs occurred for geological risks, specifically the volcanic eruption on the island of La Palma, from September to December 2021, with a figure of in excess of 35,000 euros, followed by the Lorca earthquake of May 2011 with an average cost of more than 19,000 euros.

The next sections will examine the events from several different standpoints:

  • By type of coverage.
  • By cause.
  • By the kind of property suffering loss or damage.
  • According to spatial distribution.
  • By brackets of indemnity amount for claims handled.
 

Analysis by type of coverage (property, pecuniary loss and personal injury)

The table below shows the indemnities and number of claims handled by coverage concerned: property and business interruption.
 
Event Loss Claims handled
Property % Business interruption % Property % Business Interruption %
1. 01/2009 -  Windstorm (Klaus) 590,290,147 € 98.3% 10,295,510 € 1.7% 271,177 99.9% 170 0.1%
2. 05/2011 - Earthquake (Lorca) 532,988,250 € 96.5% 19,310,043 € 3.5% 26,060 90.3% 2,796 9.7%
3. 09/2012 - Flood and windstorm 235,111,521 € 98.4% 3,871,981 € 1.6% 25,456 98.5% 398 1.5%
4. 09/2019 - Flood, coast flood 464,975,050 € 98.0% 9,726,709 € 2.0% 55,593 99.2% 474 0.8%
5. 01/2020 - Flood, coast flood and windstorm (Gloria) 208,145,540 € 95.8% 9,222,570 € 4.2% 54,189 99.8% 134 0.2%
6. 12/2021 - Flood 88,310,490 € 96.3% 3,398,611 € 3.7% 7,635 98.3% 131 1.7%
7. 09/2021 - Volcanic eruption and earthquake 216,592,813 € 97.0% 6,598,015 € 3.0% 5,597 90.1% 612 9.9%
Totals 2,336,412,811 € 97.4% 62,421,439 € 2.6% 445,707 99.0% 4,715 1.0%

Table 3. Amount of indemnities and number of claims handled which they account for by coverage.

 

Coverage for property is that which has the largest share in both indemnities (97.4%) and number of claims handled (99%), whereas the coverage for business interruption does not account for much with respect to total indemnities and total number of claims handled (2.6% and 1%, respectively).

As we can observe, events caused by geological phenomena —the Lorca earthquake and the volcano on the island of La Palma– have a different distribution as regards the number of claims handled relative to the other events studied, with a weight of around (90%) in property and (10%) in business interruption.

Turning to the form of coverage of personal injury, the next table gives us the number of victims who had CCS coverage itemised by the degree of seriousness of the harm caused (temporary injuries, permanent injuries or death):

 
Event Temporary injuries Permanent injuries Death Total víctims
1. 01/2009 - Windstorm (Klaus) 1 5 1 7
2. 05/2011 - Earthquake (Lorca) 1 4 4 9
3. 09/2012 - Flood and windstorm 2 3 8 13
4. 09/2019 - Flood and coastal flood 1 - 4 5
5. 01/2020 - Flood, coastal flood and windstorm 3 - 3 6
6. 12/2021 - Flood - - - -
7. 09/2021 - Colcanic eruption and earthquake - - - -
Totals 8 12 20 40
  20% 30% 50% 100%

Table 4. Number of victims indemnified as a result of each of the events.

 

The first five events did in fact lead to personal injury in the range of five to thirteen victims, whereas in the last two cases no personal injury covered by the CCS was caused. 

In 20% of cases there were temporary injuries, in 30% permanent injuries and in the other 50% there were fatalities.

 

Breakdown by cause

The table below shows the indemnities, number of claims handled by coverage and the average cost per cause for the seven events all taken together:

 
Peril Loss % Claims handled % Mean cost
COASTAL FLOOD 47,062,399 € 2.0% 1,870 0.4% 25,167 €
VOLCANIC ERUPTION 223,125,133 € 9.3% 6,183 1.4% 36,087€
FLOOD 904,624,306 € 37.7% 99,258 22.0% 9,114 €
WINDSTORM 671,659,425 € 28.0% 314,229 69.8% 2,137 €
EARTHQUAKE 552,362,987 € 23.0% 28,882 6.4% 19,125 €
Totals 2,398,834,250 € 100% 450,42 100% 5,326 €

Table 5. Indemnities, claims handled and average cost by peril/cause.

 

In this table the events originated by various different causes (flooding and windstorm or volcano and earthquake) have been separated out to show the causes in purer form. 

The cause having the largest amount paid out is flooding, which tops 900 million euros, followed by the ACS with over 670 million euros and the earthquake at 552 million euros. These causes respectively account for 38%, 28% and 23% of total indemnities for the selected events.

The peril which unites the biggest volume of claims handled is windstorm, which saw over 314,000, speaking for 70% of the total. This was followed by flooding, with close to 100,000 claims handled, or 22% of the total. These two causes together account for 92% of overall claims handled for the events selected.

Figure 4. Indemnities and claims handled by peril/cause.

Figure 4. Indemnities and claims handled by peril/cause.

Figure 5. Average cost of indemnities by cause.

Figure 5. Average cost of indemnities by cause.

 

The cause with the highest average cost is the volcanic eruption with a figure of over 35,000 euros, followed by coastal flood (a special type of flood which above all affects marinas and infrastructure, largely with a high repair cost) at 25,000 euros, and the earthquake with an amount approaching 20,000 euros. 

Although flooding and windstorm led the way in both amount indemnified and total claims handled, in respect of their average amount indemnified they are just shy of 9,200 euros and 2,200 euros, respectively.

To summarise, geological hazards or swells, which can easily cause structural damage to buildings, generally reap more expensive losses than flooding or gales, which bring about more localised damage which is seldom structural.

 

Analysis by kind of property affected

The table below shows the indemnities, number of claims handled by coverage and the average cost per risk class for the seven events all taken together:
 
Kind of property Loss % Claims handled % Mean cost
SHOP, WEARHOUSES AND OTHER 413,815,455 € 17.3% 28,433 6.3% 14,554 €
INDUSTRIES 369,157,486 € 15.4% 19,523 4.3% 18,909 €
CIVIL WORKS 46,586,099 € 1.9% 202 0.0% 230,624 €
OFFICES 22,416,407 € 0.9% 2,006 0.4% 11,175 €
MOTOR VEHICLES 128,475,320 € 5.4% 35,610 7.9% 3,608 €
RESIDENTIAL 1,418,383,483 € 59.1% 364,648 81.0% 3,890 €
Totals 2,398,834,250 € 100% 450,422 100% 5,326 €

Table 6. Indemnities, claims handled and average cost by kind of property.

 

The kind of property with the highest sum paid out are residential properties at more than 1,400 million euros, followed by shops, warehouses and other properties, at in excess of 400 million euros, and industries with verging on 370 million euros. These kind of properties respectively account for 59%, 17% and 16% of overall indemnities for the events selected.

The kind of property with the highest number of claims handled are residential properties at more than 369,000 and representing 81% of them.

The average cost of civil works appears very substantial and surpasses that for the other kinds of property.

 Figure 6. Indemnities and claims handled by risk class.

Figure 6. Indemnities and claims handled by risk class.

Figure 7. Average cost of indemnities by kind of property.

Figure 7. Average cost of indemnities by kind of property.

 

Spatial distribution

For each of the seven selected events we now go on to present a series of figures which depict the spatial distribution of the losses indemnified by municipal district and cost, as well as the affected percentage distribution according to each kind of property.

 
Figure 8. Windstorm Klaus, January 2009. Spatial and property class distribution for indemnities.

Figure 8. Windstorm Klaus, January 2009. Spatial and property class distribution for indemnities.

 
Figure 9. Lorca earthquake, May 2011. Spatial and property class distribution for indemnities.

Figure 9. Lorca earthquake, May 2011. Spatial and property class distribution for indemnities.

 
Figure 10. Cut-off low-caused flood of September 2012. Spatial and property class distribution for indemnities.

Figure 10. Cut-off low-caused flood of September 2012. Spatial and property class distribution for indemnities.

 
Figure 11. Cut-off low-caused flood of September 2019. Spatial and property class distribution for indemnities

Figure 11. Cut-off low-caused flood of September 2019. Spatial and property class distribution for indemnities.

 
Figure 12. Storm Gloria of January 2020. Spatial and property class distribution for indemnities.

Figure 12. Storm Gloria of January 2020. Spatial and property class distribution for indemnities.

 
Figure 13. Floods in Navarre, the Basque Country, Burgos and Aragon, December 2021. Spatial and property class distribution for indemnities.

Figure 13. Floods in Navarre, the Basque Country, Burgos and Aragon, December 2021. Spatial and property class distribution for indemnities.

 
Figure 14. La Palma volcanic eruption of 19 September to 13 December 2021. Spatial and risk class distribution for indemnities.

Figure 14. La Palma volcanic eruption of 19 September to 13 December 2021. Spatial and risk class distribution for indemnities.

 

In short, figures 8 to 14 perfectly summarise the composition of total losses according to property class: geological risks mainly affect residential properties (over 80% of them), whereas floods are more spread out among residential, commercial and industrial, with autos accounting for a notable share of losses, while episodes featuring sea-battering cause a relatively high percentage of loss and damage to civil works. Even so, we should point out that the percentage of insured civil works is lower than for other risk classes, since not much infrastructure is insured and instead it is the public authorities who repair damage which they charge to their own budgeting (in other words the authorities self-insure to a large extent). Thus, it is that the percentage of losses for civil works tends to be relatively lower than for other risk classes, which have a higher rate of insurance take-out.

The degree of impact for the seven events taken together by province:

 
Figure 15. Indemnities and claims handled by province.

Figure 15. Indemnities and claims handled by province.

 

There was a notable build-up of losses from these major events in the Murcia Region, where several different causes all appeared, namely earthquake, flooding and windstorm activity.

After Murcia, the next most significant provinces by volume of indemnities were Alicante, Barcelona and Santa Cruz de Tenerife, and, to a lesser degree, Valencia, Almería, A Coruña, Navarra, Tarragona and Girona.

The concentration of losses in the south-east and north of the Peninsula is noticeable, as well as in the province of Santa Cruz de Tenerife.

Figure 16. Percentage of indemnities by province.

Figure 16. Percentage of indemnities by province.

 

Analysis by indemnity bands

The following tables assess the distribution of loss according to bands for the amount in each claim handled for the whole set of seven events:

 
Idemnity band Loss Accumulated loss % Claims handled % of accumulated claims handled Mean cost
1. 0 € - 500 € 34,147,674 € 1.4% 143,985 32.0% 237 €
2. 500.01 € - 1,000 € 61,702,851 € 4.0% 85,338 50.9% 723 €
3. 1,000.01 € - 3,000 € 207,477,807 € 12.6% 116,557 76.8% 1,780 €
4. 3,000.01 € - 6,000 € 210,285,327 € 21.4% 49,682 87.8% 4,233 €
5. 6,000.01 € - 20,000 € 414,895,394 € 38.7% 39,962 96.7% 10,382 €
6. 20,000.01 € - 60,000 € 322,630,715 € 52.2% 10,147 98.9% 31,796 €
7. 60,000.01 € - 120,000 € 204,437,563 € 60.7% 2,372 99.5% 86,188 €
8. > 120,000.01 € 943,256,919 € 100% 2,379 100% 396,493 €
Totals 2,398,834,250 € 100% 450,422 100% 5,326 €

Table 7. Indemnities, number of claims handled and average cost by band of indemnity.

 

In 87.8% of claims handled and opened with the CCS, the indemnity per case is at a cost of less than or equal to 6,000 euros; in 99.5% of claims handled the cost will come to less than or equal to 120,000 euros; and in less than 1% of claims handled the cost is over 120,000 euros.

Within the last band there are 137 claims handled where the indemnity is more than one million euros.

 
 Figure 17. Indemnities and claims handled per band of indemnity

Figure 17. Indemnities and claims handled per band of indemnity.

READ ARTICLE

Conclusion

The 2009-2021 period seems particularly significant to analysis of major events bearing in mind that over those 13 years seven events occurred out of the fifteen most significant of them within the full set of available data since records began (a 51-year series running from 1971 to 2021). Furthermore, the information on them is more complete given how recent they have been.

The analysis of the information in this article shows that the cause (flooding, windstorm, or an earthquake or volcano) will be decisive as regards the variables that come to define the event, chiefly as regards the geographical area affected and the average costs per claim handled, as well as, though to a lesser degree, with respect to other variables, such as the property class concerned and distinction between types of coverage (damage and pecuniary loss).

SUBIR